Finland vs Latvia: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Finland
- Latvia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 96,915 Cubic metres against 24,741 Cubic metres in Latvia, a difference of 72,174 Cubic metres.
That makes Finland's figure about 3.9 times Latvia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 5th and Latvia ranks 2nd of 23 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99,279 Cubic metres | 25,280 Cubic metres | 73,999 Cubic metres | Finland |
| 2010s | 100,492 Cubic metres | 25,985 Cubic metres | 74,507 Cubic metres | Finland |
| 2020s | 96,915 Cubic metres | 26,092 Cubic metres | 70,823 Cubic metres | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Finland or Latvia?
- Finland, at 96,915 Cubic metres against 24,741 Cubic metres in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Finland and Latvia?
- 72,174 Cubic metres, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Latvia rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Finland ranks 5th and Latvia ranks 2nd of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata