Iceland vs Luxembourg: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Iceland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 758 Cubic metres against 60 Cubic metres in Iceland, a difference of 698 Cubic metres.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 12.6 times Iceland's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 23 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37 Cubic metres | 750 Cubic metres | 713 Cubic metres | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 52.22 Cubic metres | 750.78 Cubic metres | 698.56 Cubic metres | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 60 Cubic metres | 758 Cubic metres | 698 Cubic metres | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Iceland or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 758 Cubic metres against 60 Cubic metres in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 698 Cubic metres, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Luxembourg?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Luxembourg rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Iceland ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata