Japan vs Slovenia: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Japan
- Slovenia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 87,143 Cubic metres against 10,205 Cubic metres in Slovenia, a difference of 76,938 Cubic metres.
That makes Japan's figure about 8.5 times Slovenia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 5th of 23 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 38,400 Cubic metres | 4,147 Cubic metres | 34,253 Cubic metres | Japan |
| 1980s | 59,600 Cubic metres | 4,921 Cubic metres | 54,679 Cubic metres | Japan |
| 1990s | 69,000 Cubic metres | 5,301 Cubic metres | 63,699 Cubic metres | Japan |
| 2000s | 86,072 Cubic metres | 10,722 Cubic metres | 75,350 Cubic metres | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Japan or Slovenia?
- Japan, at 87,143 Cubic metres against 10,205 Cubic metres in Slovenia as of 2005.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Japan and Slovenia?
- 76,938 Cubic metres, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2005.
- How do Japan and Slovenia rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Japan ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 5th of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata