Korea vs Sweden: Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment
Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment over time
- Korea
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 103,035 Cubic metres against 33,648 Cubic metres in Korea, a difference of 69,387 Cubic metres.
That makes Sweden's figure about 3.1 times Korea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 4th of 3 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2,023 Cubic metres | 78,700 Cubic metres | 76,677 Cubic metres | Sweden |
| 1990s | 14,456 Cubic metres | 94,060 Cubic metres | 79,604 Cubic metres | Sweden |
| 2000s | 18,567 Cubic metres | 95,234 Cubic metres | 76,667 Cubic metres | Sweden |
| 2010s | 32,098 Cubic metres | 104,097 Cubic metres | 71,999 Cubic metres | Sweden |
| 2020s | 30,047 Cubic metres | 103,035 Cubic metres | 72,988 Cubic metres | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment, Korea or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 103,035 Cubic metres against 33,648 Cubic metres in Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment between Korea and Sweden?
- 69,387 Cubic metres, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
- How do Korea and Sweden rank globally for intensity of use of forest resources — gross increment?
- Korea ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 4th of 3 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Intensity of use of forest resources — Gross Increment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset traces net changes in terms of volume in the growing stock of standing wood on forest land. Forest depletion and growth describe balances or imbalances in different types of forests. The intensity of use of forest resources reflects various forest management methods and their sustainability. These data should be read in connection with other indicators, in particular land use changes and forest quality (species diversity, forest degradation), and be complemented with data on forest management practices and protection measures. Please bear in mind that definitions and estimation methods vary for some countries. For details see: Data source(s): OECD Annual Quality Assurance (AQA) questionnaire. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: March, 2026 Definitions Country metadata