Central and Southern Asia vs Iceland: Lake water quality trophic state
Central and Southern Asia
0.8%
in 2021
Iceland
2.4%
in 2021
Central and Southern Asia rank
25th
Iceland rank
22nd
Lake water quality trophic state over time
- Central and Southern Asia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.4% against 0.8% in Central and Southern Asia, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 3.0 times Central and Southern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Iceland ahead.
Central and Southern Asia ranks 25th and Iceland ranks 22nd of 30 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central and Southern Asia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central and Southern Asia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.3% | Central and Southern Asia |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 3.1% | 2.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lake water quality trophic state, Central and Southern Asia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 2.4% against 0.8% in Central and Southern Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in lake water quality trophic state between Central and Southern Asia and Iceland?
- 1.6%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central and Southern Asia and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Central and Southern Asia and Iceland rank globally for lake water quality trophic state?
- Central and Southern Asia ranks 25th and Iceland ranks 22nd of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Lake water quality trophic state (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.