Central Asia vs New Zealand: Lake water quality trophic state
Central Asia
0.6%
in 2021
New Zealand
1.8%
in 2021
Central Asia rank
32nd
New Zealand rank
39th
Lake water quality trophic state over time
- Central Asia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.8% against 0.6% in Central Asia, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.8 times Central Asia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 32nd and New Zealand ranks 39th of 36 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9% | 3.1% | 2.2% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.6% | 2.0% | 1.4% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lake water quality trophic state, Central Asia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 1.8% against 0.6% in Central Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in lake water quality trophic state between Central Asia and New Zealand?
- 1.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Central Asia and New Zealand rank globally for lake water quality trophic state?
- Central Asia ranks 32nd and New Zealand ranks 39th of 36 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Lake water quality trophic state (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.