Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) vs Mozambique: Lake water quality trophic state

Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand)
2.2%
in 2021
Mozambique
4.8%
in 2021
Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) rank
13th
Mozambique rank
11th

Lake water quality trophic state over time

  • Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand)
  • Mozambique
12345201720192021

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 4.8% against 2.2% in Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand), a difference of 2.6%.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 2.2 times Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) ahead.

Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) ranks 13th and Mozambique ranks 11th of 36 groups.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) Mozambique Difference Ahead
2010s 2.6% 3.0% 0.4% Mozambique
2020s 1.9% 3.8% 2.0% Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lake water quality trophic state, Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 4.8% against 2.2% in Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) as of 2021.
What is the difference in lake water quality trophic state between Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) and Mozambique?
2.6%, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) and Mozambique?
5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
How do Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) and Mozambique rank globally for lake water quality trophic state?
Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) ranks 13th and Mozambique ranks 11th of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Lake water quality trophic state (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) vs Mozambique: Lake water quality trophic state. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/lake-water-quality-trophic-state-percent/developed-regions-europe-cyprus-israel-northern-america-japan-australia-and-new-zealand/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/lake-water-quality-trophic-state-percent/developed-regions-europe-cyprus-israel-northern-america-japan-australia-and-new-zealand/mozambique/">Developed regions (Europe, Cyprus, Israel, Northern America, Japan, Australia & New Zealand) vs Mozambique: Lake water quality trophic state</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Lake water quality trophic state (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
179 places, 895 data points, 2017–2021
Last refreshed