Gibraltar vs Namibia: Lakes and rivers permanent water area change
Gibraltar
-1.6%
in 2022
Namibia
-1.7%
in 2022
Gibraltar rank
201st
Namibia rank
202nd
Lakes and rivers permanent water area change over time
- Gibraltar
- Namibia
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports -1.6% against -1.7% in Namibia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 201st and Namibia ranks 202nd of 232 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.7% | -7.2% | 17.9% | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | -2.4% | 9.5% | 11.9% | Namibia |
| 2020s | -2.1% | -2.5% | 0.4% | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lakes and rivers permanent water area change, Gibraltar or Namibia?
- Gibraltar, at -1.6% against -1.7% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in lakes and rivers permanent water area change between Gibraltar and Namibia?
- 0.1%, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Namibia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Gibraltar and Namibia rank globally for lakes and rivers permanent water area change?
- Gibraltar ranks 201st and Namibia ranks 202nd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Lakes and rivers permanent water area change (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.