Middle Africa vs Pitcairn: Lakes and rivers permanent water area change
Middle Africa
6.6%
in 2022
Pitcairn
299.0%
in 2022
Middle Africa rank
10th
Pitcairn rank
9th
Lakes and rivers permanent water area change over time
- Middle Africa
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 299.0% against 6.6% in Middle Africa, a difference of 292.4%.
That makes Pitcairn's figure about 45.2 times Middle Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Middle Africa ahead.
Middle Africa ranks 10th and Pitcairn ranks 9th of 24 regions.
Across the 3 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 1 and Pitcairn in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.0% | -100.0% | 104.0% | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 4.9% | 100.0% | 95.1% | Pitcairn |
| 2020s | 6.1% | 499.7% | 493.7% | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lakes and rivers permanent water area change, Middle Africa or Pitcairn?
- Pitcairn, at 299.0% against 6.6% in Middle Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in lakes and rivers permanent water area change between Middle Africa and Pitcairn?
- 292.4%, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Pitcairn?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Middle Africa and Pitcairn rank globally for lakes and rivers permanent water area change?
- Middle Africa ranks 10th and Pitcairn ranks 9th of 24 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Lakes and rivers permanent water area change (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.