New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Lakes and rivers permanent water area change
New Caledonia
0.9%
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.6%
in 2022
New Caledonia rank
170th
Zimbabwe rank
172nd
Lakes and rivers permanent water area change over time
- New Caledonia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.9% against 0.6% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 216 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.8% | -0.9% | 16.7% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 11.3% | 2.2% | 9.1% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | -0.4% | 0.2% | 0.6% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lakes and rivers permanent water area change, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
- New Caledonia, at 0.9% against 0.6% in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in lakes and rivers permanent water area change between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for lakes and rivers permanent water area change?
- New Caledonia ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 172nd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Lakes and rivers permanent water area change (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.