Belgium vs Peru: Land area — Area, per square kilometre
Belgium
0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
19th
Peru rank
19th
Land area — Area, per square kilometre over time
- Belgium
- Peru
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0 1000 ha per square kilometre.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 19th and Peru ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre | 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre | 0 1000 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2010s | 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre | 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre | 0 1000 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2020s | 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre | 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre | 0 1000 ha per square kilometre | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land area — area, per square kilometre, Belgium or Peru?
- Belgium, at 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.1 1000 ha per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land area — area, per square kilometre between Belgium and Peru?
- 0 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Peru?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Peru rank globally for land area — area, per square kilometre?
- Belgium ranks 19th and Peru ranks 19th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land area — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land area — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.