Chile vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre

Chile
0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
68th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
70th

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 68th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 70th of 162 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0017 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 ha per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0016 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 ha per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre, Chile or Trinidad and Tobago?
Chile, at 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre between Chile and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 68th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 70th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-square-kilometre/chile/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-square-kilometre/chile/trinidad-and-tobago/">Chile vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,884 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.