El Salvador vs New Caledonia: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
104th
New Caledonia rank
105th

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • New Caledonia
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 105th of 162 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0009 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.0015 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0018 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0021 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0019 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0009 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre, El Salvador or New Caledonia?
El Salvador, at 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre between El Salvador and New Caledonia?
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and New Caledonia rank globally for land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 105th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs New Caledonia: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/new-caledonia/">El Salvador vs New Caledonia: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,884 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.