Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.0029 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
53rd
Puerto Rico rank
56th

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Puerto Rico
00.0010.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0029 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Eswatini ranks 53rd and Puerto Rico ranks 56th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Puerto Rico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0028 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0029 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0029 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0029 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre, Eswatini or Puerto Rico?
Eswatini, at 0.0029 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre between Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Puerto Rico rank globally for land area equipped for irrigation — area, per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 53rd and Puerto Rico ranks 56th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/puerto-rico-us/">Eswatini vs Puerto Rico: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,884 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.