What is the difference in land area equipped for irrigation — area, per unit of gdp between Denmark and New Caledonia?

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and New Caledonia?

60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Denmark vs New Caledonia: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP

Denmark

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Denmark rank

93rd

New Caledonia rank

96th

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP over time

Denmark
New Caledonia

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Denmark ranks 93rd and New Caledonia ranks 96th of 161 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 5 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Denmark	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1970s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Denmark
1980s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Denmark
1990s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Denmark
2000s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Denmark
2010s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Denmark
2020s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land area equipped for irrigation — area, per unit of gdp, Denmark or New Caledonia?: Denmark, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in land area equipped for irrigation — area, per unit of gdp between Denmark and New Caledonia?: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and New Caledonia?: 60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Denmark and New Caledonia rank globally for land area equipped for irrigation — area, per unit of gdp?: Denmark ranks 93rd and New Caledonia ranks 96th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs New Caledonia: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-area-equipped-for-irrigation-area-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/new-caledonia/">Denmark vs New Caledonia: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 164 places, 8,471 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Land area equipped for irrigation — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.