Iceland vs Latvia: Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP
Iceland
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iceland rank
161st
Latvia rank
158th
Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Iceland
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Iceland, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 18.7 times Iceland's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 158th of 161 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land area equipped for irrigation — area, per unit of gdp, Iceland or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in land area equipped for irrigation — area, per unit of gdp between Iceland and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Latvia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Latvia rank globally for land area equipped for irrigation — area, per unit of gdp?
- Iceland ranks 161st and Latvia ranks 158th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land area equipped for irrigation — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land area equipped for irrigation — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.