Bhutan vs Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur: Land cover and land cover change — Gain of artificial surfaces

Bhutan
3.98 Square kilometres
in 2022
Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
810.99 Square kilometres
in 2022
Bhutan rank
158th
Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur rank
156th

Land cover and land cover change — Gain of artificial surfaces over time

  • Bhutan
  • Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
0200400600800200520132022

How they compare

Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur currently reports 810.99 Square kilometres against 3.98 Square kilometres in Bhutan, a difference of 807.01 Square kilometres.

That makes Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur's figure about 203.5 times Bhutan's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 158th and Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur ranks 156th of 164 countries.

Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0848 Square kilometres 320.44 Square kilometres 320.35 Square kilometres Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
2010s 2.5 Square kilometres 592.17 Square kilometres 589.67 Square kilometres Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
2020s 3.81 Square kilometres 787.84 Square kilometres 784.02 Square kilometres Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land cover and land cover change — gain of artificial surfaces, Bhutan or Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur?
Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, at 810.99 Square kilometres against 3.98 Square kilometres in Bhutan as of 2022.
What is the difference in land cover and land cover change — gain of artificial surfaces between Bhutan and Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur?
807.01 Square kilometres, with Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
How do Bhutan and Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur rank globally for land cover and land cover change — gain of artificial surfaces?
Bhutan ranks 158th and Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur ranks 156th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land cover and land cover change — Gain of artificial surfaces. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur: Land cover and land cover change — Gain of artificial surfaces. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-cover-and-land-cover-change-gain-of-artificial-surfaces/bhutan/provence-alpes-cote-d-azur/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-cover-and-land-cover-change-gain-of-artificial-surfaces/bhutan/provence-alpes-cote-d-azur/">Bhutan vs Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur: Land cover and land cover change — Gain of artificial surfaces</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land cover and land cover change — Gain of artificial surfaces
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
978 places, 4,890 data points, 2005–2022
Last refreshed

The land cover dataset provides a global assessment of land cover and land cover change to monitor pressures on ecosystems and biodiversity. By using geospatial data with high spatio-temporal resolution, it develops a set of internationally comparable indicators with a long time series and a five-year interval from 2000 to 2022 for the Climate Change Initiative Land Cover dataset, and from 1975 to 2030 for the Global Human Settlement Layer dataset. Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The dataset has a global coverage on the national level, while on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. The following country aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas, the LAC region and the World. Data source(s): Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Global Human Settlement Layer built-up area data. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Database documentation