Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Agriculture area under organic agriculture

Namibia
6.59 Square kilometres
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3.51 Square kilometres
in 2023
Namibia rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
128th

Land use hidden — Agriculture area under organic agriculture over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300200720152023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 6.59 Square kilometres against 3.51 Square kilometres in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.08 Square kilometres.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.9 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 2.5 Square kilometres 3.5 Square kilometres 1 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2010s 141.91 Square kilometres 12.64 Square kilometres 129.27 Square kilometres Namibia
2020s 5.46 Square kilometres 9.62 Square kilometres 4.16 Square kilometres Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — agriculture area under organic agriculture, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 6.59 Square kilometres against 3.51 Square kilometres in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — agriculture area under organic agriculture between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
3.08 Square kilometres, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — agriculture area under organic agriculture?
Namibia ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Agriculture area under organic agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Agriculture area under organic agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-agriculture-area-under-organic-agriculture/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-agriculture-area-under-organic-agriculture/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Agriculture area under organic agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Agriculture area under organic agriculture
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
172 places, 2,914 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata