Chile vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

Chile
0.0258 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
0.0286 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
152nd
Hong Kong rank
149th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Hong Kong
0.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0286 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0258 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0028 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 152nd and Hong Kong ranks 149th of 177 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0527 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1307 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.078 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 0.0571 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1046 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0475 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 0.049 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0796 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0306 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 0.0339 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0658 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0319 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 0.0258 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0533 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0275 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 0.0262 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0395 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0133 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 0.026 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0286 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0026 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, Chile or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 0.0286 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0258 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between Chile and Hong Kong?
0.0028 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hong Kong?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Hong Kong rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 152nd and Hong Kong ranks 149th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/chile/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/chile/hong-kong-sar-china/">Chile vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.