Congo vs Somalia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

Congo
0.0191 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
0.018 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
157th
Somalia rank
158th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Somalia
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0191 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.018 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Somalia, a difference of 0.0011 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 157th and Somalia ranks 158th of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Somalia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Somalia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.016 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0147 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0012 Square kilometres per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.016 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0155 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0005 Square kilometres per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.016 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0163 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0003 Square kilometres per square kilometre Somalia
1990s 0.0154 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0168 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0014 Square kilometres per square kilometre Somalia
2000s 0.016 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0175 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0015 Square kilometres per square kilometre Somalia
2010s 0.0182 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0176 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0005 Square kilometres per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0192 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.018 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0012 Square kilometres per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, Congo or Somalia?
Congo, at 0.0191 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.018 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Somalia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between Congo and Somalia?
0.0011 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Somalia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Somalia rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 157th and Somalia ranks 158th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Somalia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/somalia-fed-rep/">Congo vs Somalia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.