Ecuador vs Panama: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.097 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.0918 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
107th
Panama rank
108th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Panama
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.097 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0918 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.0052 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 107th and Panama ranks 108th of 177 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0913 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0749 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0164 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0923 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0735 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0189 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0969 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0799 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0171 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.1106 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.089 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0216 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.1039 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0954 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0085 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.1003 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0968 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0035 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0974 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0911 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0063 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Panama?
Ecuador, at 0.097 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0918 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Panama?
0.0052 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Panama rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 107th and Panama ranks 108th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Panama: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/panama/">Ecuador vs Panama: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.