Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.097 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1051 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
107th
Zimbabwe rank
104th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
0.020.040.060.080.10.12196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1051 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.097 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0081 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0913 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0299 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0614 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0923 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0449 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0475 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0969 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0647 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0323 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.1106 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0823 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0283 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.1039 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1015 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0024 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.1003 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1058 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0055 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0974 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1053 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0078 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1051 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.097 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
0.0081 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.