El Salvador vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.4252 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
0.4417 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
18th
Gambia rank
15th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Gambia
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.4417 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.4252 Square kilometres per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0165 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 18th and Gambia ranks 15th of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Gambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3078 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1267 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1811 Square kilometres per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.3341 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1575 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1766 Square kilometres per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.3697 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1826 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1871 Square kilometres per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.406 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1933 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2127 Square kilometres per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.4173 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2968 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1204 Square kilometres per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.4232 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4486 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0254 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.4252 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4417 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0165 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, El Salvador or Gambia?
Gambia, at 0.4417 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.4252 Square kilometres per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between El Salvador and Gambia?
0.0165 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Gambia rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 18th and Gambia ranks 15th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/gambia-the/">El Salvador vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.