Kuwait vs Namibia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

Kuwait
0.0079 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait rank
168th
Namibia rank
166th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • Kuwait
  • Namibia
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0079 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Kuwait, a difference of 0.002 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Kuwait's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Kuwait ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 166th of 177 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0078 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0073 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0006 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0079 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0074 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0017 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.008 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0063 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0035 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0092 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0057 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0081 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0018 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0086 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0098 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0013 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0079 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.002 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, Kuwait or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0079 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Kuwait as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between Kuwait and Namibia?
0.002 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and Namibia rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
Kuwait ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 166th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs Namibia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/namibia/">Kuwait vs Namibia: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.