Namibia vs Singapore: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

Namibia
0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0092 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
166th
Singapore rank
167th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Singapore
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0092 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0007 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Namibia ranks 166th and Singapore ranks 167th of 177 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0078 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.194 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1862 Square kilometres per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 0.0079 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1388 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1309 Square kilometres per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.008 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0746 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0666 Square kilometres per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0092 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0191 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.01 Square kilometres per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.013 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0031 Square kilometres per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.0098 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0096 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0002 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0092 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0007 Square kilometres per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, Namibia or Singapore?
Namibia, at 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0092 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between Namibia and Singapore?
0.0007 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Singapore rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 166th and Singapore ranks 167th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Singapore: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/namibia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/namibia/singapore/">Namibia vs Singapore: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.