Pakistan vs San Marino: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre

Pakistan
0.4021 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
0.3833 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
22nd
San Marino rank
25th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • San Marino
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.4021 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.3833 Square kilometres per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 0.0188 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 22nd and San Marino ranks 25th of 177 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan San Marino Difference Ahead
1960s 0.409 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2424 Square kilometres per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 0.4014 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2347 Square kilometres per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.4111 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2444 Square kilometres per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.4019 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2352 Square kilometres per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.4049 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2383 Square kilometres per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 0.406 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.275 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.131 Square kilometres per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0.4042 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3833 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0208 Square kilometres per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre, Pakistan or San Marino?
Pakistan, at 0.4021 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.3833 Square kilometres per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre between Pakistan and San Marino?
0.0188 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and San Marino?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and San Marino rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 22nd and San Marino ranks 25th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs San Marino: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/san-marino/">Pakistan vs San Marino: Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 10,465 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.