Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Land use hidden — Cropland, per unit of GDP

Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sweden
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
126th
Sweden rank
129th

Land use hidden — Cropland, per unit of GDP over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Sweden
0000196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th and Sweden ranks 129th of 175 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — cropland, per unit of gdp, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Sweden?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — cropland, per unit of gdp between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden rank globally for land use hidden — cropland, per unit of gdp?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 126th and Sweden ranks 129th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Cropland, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Land use hidden — Cropland, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-unit-of-gdp/st-kitts-and-nevis/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-cropland-per-unit-of-gdp/st-kitts-and-nevis/sweden/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Land use hidden — Cropland, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Cropland, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 9,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Cropland divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.