OECD Asia Oceania vs Wallis and Futuna: Land use hidden — Land area, annual growth rate

OECD Asia Oceania
0.0008 % change on previous year
in 2023
Wallis and Futuna
1.43 % change on previous year
in 2023
OECD Asia Oceania rank
2nd
Wallis and Futuna rank
1st

Land use hidden — Land area, annual growth rate over time

  • OECD Asia Oceania
  • Wallis and Futuna
00.511.5196219922023

How they compare

Wallis and Futuna currently reports 1.43 % change on previous year against 0.0008 % change on previous year in OECD Asia Oceania, a difference of 1.43 % change on previous year.

That makes Wallis and Futuna's figure about 1,722.3 times OECD Asia Oceania's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Wallis and Futuna ahead.

OECD Asia Oceania ranks 2nd and Wallis and Futuna ranks 1st of 3 regions.

Across the 7 decades both report, OECD Asia Oceania averaged higher in 2 and Wallis and Futuna in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD Asia Oceania Wallis and Futuna Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
1970s -0.0004 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0004 % change on previous year Wallis and Futuna
1980s -0.0021 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0021 % change on previous year Wallis and Futuna
1990s -0.0001 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0001 % change on previous year Wallis and Futuna
2000s 0.0007 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0007 % change on previous year OECD Asia Oceania
2010s 0.0122 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.0122 % change on previous year OECD Asia Oceania
2020s 0.0002 % change on previous year 0.3571 % change on previous year 0.3569 % change on previous year Wallis and Futuna

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — land area, annual growth rate, OECD Asia Oceania or Wallis and Futuna?
Wallis and Futuna, at 1.43 % change on previous year against 0.0008 % change on previous year in OECD Asia Oceania as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — land area, annual growth rate between OECD Asia Oceania and Wallis and Futuna?
1.43 % change on previous year, with Wallis and Futuna ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD Asia Oceania and Wallis and Futuna?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do OECD Asia Oceania and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for land use hidden — land area, annual growth rate?
OECD Asia Oceania ranks 2nd and Wallis and Futuna ranks 1st of 3 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Land area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD Asia Oceania vs Wallis and Futuna: Land use hidden — Land area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-land-area-annual-growth-rate/oecd-asia-oceania/wallis-and-futuna/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-land-area-annual-growth-rate/oecd-asia-oceania/wallis-and-futuna/">OECD Asia Oceania vs Wallis and Futuna: Land use hidden — Land area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Land area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 13,215 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Land use hidden — Land area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.