Colombia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Land use hidden — Land area, per capita

Colombia
0.0212 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0206 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Colombia rank
55th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
56th

Land use hidden — Land area, per capita over time

  • Colombia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.0212 Square kilometres per person against 0.0206 Square kilometres per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0006 Square kilometres per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Colombia ranks 55th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 56th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0614 Square kilometres per person 0.1682 Square kilometres per person 0.1068 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.0482 Square kilometres per person 0.1493 Square kilometres per person 0.1011 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.0385 Square kilometres per person 0.1034 Square kilometres per person 0.0649 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0314 Square kilometres per person 0.0657 Square kilometres per person 0.0343 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0266 Square kilometres per person 0.0412 Square kilometres per person 0.0146 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0236 Square kilometres per person 0.0267 Square kilometres per person 0.0031 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0216 Square kilometres per person 0.0209 Square kilometres per person 0.0006 Square kilometres per person Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — land area, per capita, Colombia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Colombia, at 0.0212 Square kilometres per person against 0.0206 Square kilometres per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — land area, per capita between Colombia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0006 Square kilometres per person, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for land use hidden — land area, per capita?
Colombia ranks 55th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 56th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Land area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Land use hidden — Land area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-land-area-per-capita/colombia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-land-area-per-capita/colombia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Colombia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Land use hidden — Land area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Land area, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Land area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.