Afghanistan vs Kyrgyzstan: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Afghanistan
12,080 Square kilometres
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
11,144 Square kilometres
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
98th
Kyrgyzstan rank
101st

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Kyrgyzstan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020062023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 12,080 Square kilometres against 11,144 Square kilometres in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 936 Square kilometres.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 98th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 101st of 189 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 12,084 Square kilometres 9,984 Square kilometres 2,101 Square kilometres Afghanistan
2000s 12,084 Square kilometres 10,288 Square kilometres 1,797 Square kilometres Afghanistan
2010s 12,084 Square kilometres 10,561 Square kilometres 1,523 Square kilometres Afghanistan
2020s 12,083 Square kilometres 11,005 Square kilometres 1,078 Square kilometres Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Afghanistan or Kyrgyzstan?
Afghanistan, at 12,080 Square kilometres against 11,144 Square kilometres in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan?
936 Square kilometres, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Afghanistan ranks 98th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 101st of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Kyrgyzstan: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/afghanistan/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/afghanistan/kyrgyz-republic/">Afghanistan vs Kyrgyzstan: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata