Angola vs Eswatini: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Angola
641,552 Square kilometres
in 2023
Eswatini
4,054 Square kilometres
in 2023
Angola rank
11th
Eswatini rank
11th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Angola
  • Eswatini
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 641,552 Square kilometres against 4,054 Square kilometres in Eswatini, a difference of 637,498 Square kilometres.

That makes Angola's figure about 158.2 times Eswatini's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 11th and Eswatini ranks 11th of 189 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 776,113 Square kilometres 3,121 Square kilometres 772,992 Square kilometres Angola
2000s 742,994 Square kilometres 3,449 Square kilometres 739,545 Square kilometres Angola
2010s 688,160 Square kilometres 3,776 Square kilometres 684,384 Square kilometres Angola
2020s 649,777 Square kilometres 4,005 Square kilometres 645,771 Square kilometres Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Angola or Eswatini?
Angola, at 641,552 Square kilometres against 4,054 Square kilometres in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Angola and Eswatini?
637,498 Square kilometres, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Eswatini?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Angola and Eswatini rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Angola ranks 11th and Eswatini ranks 11th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Eswatini: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/angola/eswatini-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/angola/eswatini-2/">Angola vs Eswatini: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata