Australia vs Latvia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Australia
1.32 million Square kilometres
in 2023
Latvia
29,396 Square kilometres
in 2023
Australia rank
7th
Latvia rank
4th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Australia
  • Latvia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.32 million Square kilometres against 29,396 Square kilometres in Latvia, a difference of 1.29 million Square kilometres.

That makes Australia's figure about 44.8 times Latvia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 4th of 189 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.31 million Square kilometres 28,918 Square kilometres 1.29 million Square kilometres Australia
2000s 1.29 million Square kilometres 29,394 Square kilometres 1.26 million Square kilometres Australia
2010s 1.30 million Square kilometres 29,559 Square kilometres 1.27 million Square kilometres Australia
2020s 1.32 million Square kilometres 29,425 Square kilometres 1.29 million Square kilometres Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Australia or Latvia?
Australia, at 1.32 million Square kilometres against 29,396 Square kilometres in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Australia and Latvia?
1.29 million Square kilometres, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Australia ranks 7th and Latvia ranks 4th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Latvia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/australia/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/australia/latvia-2/">Australia vs Latvia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata