Belarus vs Namibia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Belarus
65,680 Square kilometres
in 2023
Namibia
64,259 Square kilometres
in 2023
Belarus rank
56th
Namibia rank
57th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Belarus
  • Namibia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020062023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 65,680 Square kilometres against 64,259 Square kilometres in Namibia, a difference of 1,421 Square kilometres.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.

Belarus ranks 56th and Namibia ranks 57th of 189 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 64,862 Square kilometres 83,786 Square kilometres 18,924 Square kilometres Namibia
2000s 64,445 Square kilometres 77,395 Square kilometres 12,950 Square kilometres Namibia
2010s 64,850 Square kilometres 70,295 Square kilometres 5,444 Square kilometres Namibia
2020s 65,615 Square kilometres 65,324 Square kilometres 291.33 Square kilometres Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Belarus or Namibia?
Belarus, at 65,680 Square kilometres against 64,259 Square kilometres in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Belarus and Namibia?
1,421 Square kilometres, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Namibia rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Belarus ranks 56th and Namibia ranks 57th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Namibia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/belarus/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/belarus/namibia/">Belarus vs Namibia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata