Belarus vs Philippines: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Belarus
65,680 Square kilometres
in 2023
Philippines
69,037 Square kilometres
in 2023
Belarus rank
56th
Philippines rank
55th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Belarus
  • Philippines
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020062023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 69,037 Square kilometres against 65,680 Square kilometres in Belarus, a difference of 3,357 Square kilometres.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 56th and Philippines ranks 55th of 189 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 64,862 Square kilometres 72,135 Square kilometres 7,272 Square kilometres Philippines
2000s 64,445 Square kilometres 67,639 Square kilometres 3,194 Square kilometres Philippines
2010s 64,850 Square kilometres 66,327 Square kilometres 1,476 Square kilometres Philippines
2020s 65,615 Square kilometres 68,559 Square kilometres 2,944 Square kilometres Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Belarus or Philippines?
Philippines, at 69,037 Square kilometres against 65,680 Square kilometres in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Belarus and Philippines?
3,357 Square kilometres, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Philippines?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Philippines rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Belarus ranks 56th and Philippines ranks 55th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Philippines: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/belarus/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/belarus/philippines/">Belarus vs Philippines: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata