Chile vs Suriname: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Chile
152,983 Square kilometres
in 2023
Suriname
151,454 Square kilometres
in 2023
Chile rank
33rd
Suriname rank
34th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Chile
  • Suriname
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020062023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 152,983 Square kilometres against 151,454 Square kilometres in Suriname, a difference of 1,529 Square kilometres.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Suriname ahead.

Chile ranks 33rd and Suriname ranks 34th of 189 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 135,724 Square kilometres 153,476 Square kilometres 17,752 Square kilometres Suriname
2000s 136,991 Square kilometres 153,082 Square kilometres 16,092 Square kilometres Suriname
2010s 144,532 Square kilometres 152,416 Square kilometres 7,884 Square kilometres Suriname
2020s 151,622 Square kilometres 151,638 Square kilometres 16 Square kilometres Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Chile or Suriname?
Chile, at 152,983 Square kilometres against 151,454 Square kilometres in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Chile and Suriname?
1,529 Square kilometres, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Chile ranks 33rd and Suriname ranks 34th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Suriname: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/chile/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/chile/suriname/">Chile vs Suriname: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata