Chile vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Chile
152,983 Square kilometres
in 2023
Zimbabwe
171,984 Square kilometres
in 2023
Chile rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
30th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 171,984 Square kilometres against 152,983 Square kilometres in Chile, a difference of 19,001 Square kilometres.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 189 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 135,724 Square kilometres 184,807 Square kilometres 49,083 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2000s 136,991 Square kilometres 180,441 Square kilometres 43,450 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2010s 144,532 Square kilometres 175,900 Square kilometres 31,368 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2020s 151,622 Square kilometres 172,675 Square kilometres 21,053 Square kilometres Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Chile or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 171,984 Square kilometres against 152,983 Square kilometres in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Chile and Zimbabwe?
19,001 Square kilometres, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Chile ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata