China vs Estonia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

China
1.38 million Square kilometres
in 2023
Estonia
22,227 Square kilometres
in 2023
China rank
6th
Estonia rank
5th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • China
  • Estonia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 1.38 million Square kilometres against 22,227 Square kilometres in Estonia, a difference of 1.35 million Square kilometres.

That makes China's figure about 61.9 times Estonia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 6th and Estonia ranks 5th of 189 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.18 million Square kilometres 20,273 Square kilometres 1.16 million Square kilometres China
2000s 1.24 million Square kilometres 20,806 Square kilometres 1.22 million Square kilometres China
2010s 1.31 million Square kilometres 21,883 Square kilometres 1.29 million Square kilometres China
2020s 1.36 million Square kilometres 22,227 Square kilometres 1.34 million Square kilometres China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, China or Estonia?
China, at 1.38 million Square kilometres against 22,227 Square kilometres in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between China and Estonia?
1.35 million Square kilometres, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China and Estonia rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
China ranks 6th and Estonia ranks 5th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Estonia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/china/estonia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/china/estonia-2/">China vs Estonia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata