China (People’s Republic of) vs Latvia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Latvia
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 1.38 million Square kilometres against 29,396 Square kilometres in Latvia, a difference of 1.35 million Square kilometres.
That makes China (People’s Republic of)'s figure about 46.8 times Latvia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, China (People’s Republic of) has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 4th of 189 countries.
China (People’s Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.18 million Square kilometres | 28,918 Square kilometres | 1.15 million Square kilometres | China (People’s Republic of) |
| 2000s | 1.24 million Square kilometres | 29,394 Square kilometres | 1.22 million Square kilometres | China (People’s Republic of) |
| 2010s | 1.31 million Square kilometres | 29,559 Square kilometres | 1.28 million Square kilometres | China (People’s Republic of) |
| 2020s | 1.36 million Square kilometres | 29,425 Square kilometres | 1.33 million Square kilometres | China (People’s Republic of) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, China (People’s Republic of) or Latvia?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 1.38 million Square kilometres against 29,396 Square kilometres in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between China (People’s Republic of) and Latvia?
- 1.35 million Square kilometres, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Latvia rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 6th and Latvia ranks 4th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata