Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Equatorial Guinea
22,984 Square kilometres
in 2023
Poland
20,540 Square kilometres
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
4th
Poland rank
6th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Poland
010.0k20.0k30.0k199020062023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 22,984 Square kilometres against 20,540 Square kilometres in Poland, a difference of 2,444 Square kilometres.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Poland ranks 6th of 12 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 26,053 Square kilometres 20,540 Square kilometres 5,513 Square kilometres Equatorial Guinea
2000s 24,530 Square kilometres 20,540 Square kilometres 3,990 Square kilometres Equatorial Guinea
2010s 23,694 Square kilometres 20,540 Square kilometres 3,154 Square kilometres Equatorial Guinea
2020s 23,109 Square kilometres 20,540 Square kilometres 2,569 Square kilometres Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Equatorial Guinea or Poland?
Equatorial Guinea, at 22,984 Square kilometres against 20,540 Square kilometres in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
2,444 Square kilometres, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Poland rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and Poland ranks 6th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/equatorial-guinea-2/poland-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/equatorial-guinea-2/poland-2/">Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata