Equatorial Guinea vs United States: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Equatorial Guinea
22,984 Square kilometres
in 2023
United States
2.82 million Square kilometres
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
4th
United States rank
5th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • United States
01.0M2.0M3.0M199020062023

How they compare

United States currently reports 2.82 million Square kilometres against 22,984 Square kilometres in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2.80 million Square kilometres.

That makes United States's figure about 122.8 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and United States ranks 5th of 15 groups.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea United States Difference Ahead
1990s 26,053 Square kilometres 2.83 million Square kilometres 2.80 million Square kilometres United States
2000s 24,530 Square kilometres 2.82 million Square kilometres 2.80 million Square kilometres United States
2010s 23,694 Square kilometres 2.83 million Square kilometres 2.81 million Square kilometres United States
2020s 23,109 Square kilometres 2.82 million Square kilometres 2.80 million Square kilometres United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Equatorial Guinea or United States?
United States, at 2.82 million Square kilometres against 22,984 Square kilometres in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Equatorial Guinea and United States?
2.80 million Square kilometres, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and United States?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and United States rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 4th and United States ranks 5th of 15 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs United States: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/equatorial-guinea-2/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/equatorial-guinea-2/united-states/">Equatorial Guinea vs United States: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata