Eritrea vs Kyrgyzstan: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Eritrea
9,978 Square kilometres
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
11,144 Square kilometres
in 2023
Eritrea rank
103rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
101st

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Eritrea
  • Kyrgyzstan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199220072023

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 11,144 Square kilometres against 9,978 Square kilometres in Eritrea, a difference of 1,166 Square kilometres.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 101st of 189 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 11,145 Square kilometres 10,003 Square kilometres 1,142 Square kilometres Eritrea
2000s 10,799 Square kilometres 10,288 Square kilometres 510.82 Square kilometres Eritrea
2010s 10,363 Square kilometres 10,561 Square kilometres 197.84 Square kilometres Kyrgyzstan
2020s 10,049 Square kilometres 11,005 Square kilometres 956.68 Square kilometres Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Eritrea or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 11,144 Square kilometres against 9,978 Square kilometres in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Eritrea and Kyrgyzstan?
1,166 Square kilometres, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kyrgyzstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Eritrea ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 101st of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Kyrgyzstan: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/eritrea/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/eritrea/kyrgyz-republic/">Eritrea vs Kyrgyzstan: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata