Eswatini vs Lithuania: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Eswatini
4,054 Square kilometres
in 2023
Lithuania
15,854 Square kilometres
in 2023
Eswatini rank
8th
Lithuania rank
7th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lithuania
5.0k10.0k15.0k199020062023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 15,854 Square kilometres against 4,054 Square kilometres in Eswatini, a difference of 11,800 Square kilometres.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 3.9 times Eswatini's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 8th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 12 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 3,154 Square kilometres 15,449 Square kilometres 12,295 Square kilometres Lithuania
2000s 3,449 Square kilometres 15,900 Square kilometres 12,451 Square kilometres Lithuania
2010s 3,776 Square kilometres 16,079 Square kilometres 12,303 Square kilometres Lithuania
2020s 4,005 Square kilometres 15,877 Square kilometres 11,872 Square kilometres Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Eswatini or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 15,854 Square kilometres against 4,054 Square kilometres in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Eswatini and Lithuania?
11,800 Square kilometres, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lithuania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Lithuania rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Eswatini ranks 8th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Lithuania: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/eswatini-2/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/eswatini-2/lithuania-2/">Eswatini vs Lithuania: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata