Eswatini vs Micronesia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Eswatini
4,054 Square kilometres
in 2023
Micronesia
503 Square kilometres
in 2023
Eswatini rank
8th
Micronesia rank
11th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Eswatini
  • Micronesia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199020062023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 4,054 Square kilometres against 503 Square kilometres in Micronesia, a difference of 3,551 Square kilometres.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 8.1 times Micronesia's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 8th and Micronesia ranks 11th of 12 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Micronesia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,138 Square kilometres 449.8 Square kilometres 2,688 Square kilometres Eswatini
2000s 3,449 Square kilometres 481.11 Square kilometres 2,968 Square kilometres Eswatini
2010s 3,776 Square kilometres 500.48 Square kilometres 3,276 Square kilometres Eswatini
2020s 4,005 Square kilometres 502.55 Square kilometres 3,503 Square kilometres Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Eswatini or Micronesia?
Eswatini, at 4,054 Square kilometres against 503 Square kilometres in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Eswatini and Micronesia?
3,551 Square kilometres, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Micronesia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Micronesia rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Eswatini ranks 8th and Micronesia ranks 11th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Micronesia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/eswatini-2/micronesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/eswatini-2/micronesia/">Eswatini vs Micronesia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata