Ethiopia vs Latvia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Ethiopia
155,074 Square kilometres
in 2023
Latvia
29,396 Square kilometres
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
1st
Latvia rank
4th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Latvia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199220072023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 155,074 Square kilometres against 29,396 Square kilometres in Latvia, a difference of 125,678 Square kilometres.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 5.3 times Latvia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 4th of 12 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 184,809 Square kilometres 28,948 Square kilometres 155,861 Square kilometres Ethiopia
2000s 176,799 Square kilometres 29,394 Square kilometres 147,405 Square kilometres Ethiopia
2010s 165,211 Square kilometres 29,559 Square kilometres 135,653 Square kilometres Ethiopia
2020s 156,863 Square kilometres 29,425 Square kilometres 127,438 Square kilometres Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Ethiopia or Latvia?
Ethiopia, at 155,074 Square kilometres against 29,396 Square kilometres in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Ethiopia and Latvia?
125,678 Square kilometres, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Latvia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Latvia rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Ethiopia ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 4th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Latvia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/ethiopia-2/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/ethiopia-2/latvia-2/">Ethiopia vs Latvia: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata