Iceland vs Mayotte: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Iceland
119.1 Square kilometres
in 2023
Mayotte
131.6 Square kilometres
in 2023
Iceland rank
158th
Mayotte rank
156th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Iceland
  • Mayotte
050100150200199020062023

How they compare

Mayotte currently reports 131.6 Square kilometres against 119.1 Square kilometres in Iceland, a difference of 12.5 Square kilometres.

That makes Mayotte's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Mayotte has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 158th and Mayotte ranks 156th of 189 countries.

Mayotte has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mayotte Difference Ahead
1990s 107.03 Square kilometres 173.28 Square kilometres 66.25 Square kilometres Mayotte
2000s 111.33 Square kilometres 147.31 Square kilometres 35.98 Square kilometres Mayotte
2010s 115.6 Square kilometres 136.75 Square kilometres 21.15 Square kilometres Mayotte
2020s 118.5 Square kilometres 132.5 Square kilometres 14 Square kilometres Mayotte

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Iceland or Mayotte?
Mayotte, at 131.6 Square kilometres against 119.1 Square kilometres in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Iceland and Mayotte?
12.5 Square kilometres, with Mayotte ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mayotte?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mayotte rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Iceland ranks 158th and Mayotte ranks 156th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mayotte: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/iceland/mayotte/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/iceland/mayotte/">Iceland vs Mayotte: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata