Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Malaysia
172,902 Square kilometres
in 2023
Zimbabwe
171,984 Square kilometres
in 2023
Malaysia rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
30th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Malaysia
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020062023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 172,902 Square kilometres against 171,984 Square kilometres in Zimbabwe, a difference of 918 Square kilometres.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 189 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 184,048 Square kilometres 184,807 Square kilometres 758.6 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2000s 178,725 Square kilometres 180,441 Square kilometres 1,715 Square kilometres Zimbabwe
2010s 176,275 Square kilometres 175,900 Square kilometres 375.1 Square kilometres Malaysia
2020s 173,536 Square kilometres 172,675 Square kilometres 861 Square kilometres Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
Malaysia, at 172,902 Square kilometres against 171,984 Square kilometres in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
918 Square kilometres, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Malaysia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/malaysia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/malaysia/zimbabwe/">Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata