Namibia vs Romania: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest

Namibia
64,259 Square kilometres
in 2023
Romania
60,340 Square kilometres
in 2023
Namibia rank
57th
Romania rank
59th

Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time

  • Namibia
  • Romania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199020062023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 64,259 Square kilometres against 60,340 Square kilometres in Romania, a difference of 3,919 Square kilometres.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 57th and Romania ranks 59th of 189 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 84,496 Square kilometres 58,408 Square kilometres 26,089 Square kilometres Namibia
2000s 77,395 Square kilometres 58,996 Square kilometres 18,399 Square kilometres Namibia
2010s 70,295 Square kilometres 59,894 Square kilometres 10,400 Square kilometres Namibia
2020s 65,324 Square kilometres 60,340 Square kilometres 4,984 Square kilometres Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Namibia or Romania?
Namibia, at 64,259 Square kilometres against 60,340 Square kilometres in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Namibia and Romania?
3,919 Square kilometres, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Romania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Romania rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
Namibia ranks 57th and Romania ranks 59th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Romania: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/namibia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-naturally-regenerating-forest/namibia/romania/">Namibia vs Romania: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
213 places, 7,126 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata