Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha vs San Marino: Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest
Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest over time
- Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
- San Marino
How they compare
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 20 Square kilometres against 10 Square kilometres in San Marino, a difference of 10 Square kilometres.
That makes Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 2.0 times San Marino's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 167th and San Marino ranks 170th of 189 countries.
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2000s | 20 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2010s | 20 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2020s | 20 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | 10 Square kilometres | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha or San Marino?
- Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, at 20 Square kilometres against 10 Square kilometres in San Marino as of 2022.
- What is the difference in land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest between Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha and San Marino?
- 10 Square kilometres, with Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha and San Marino?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
- How do Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha and San Marino rank globally for land use hidden — naturally regenerating forest?
- Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 167th and San Marino ranks 170th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Naturally regenerating forest. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata