Aruba vs China: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita

Aruba
0.0015 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
China
0.0014 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Aruba rank
108th
China rank
110th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita over time

  • Aruba
  • China
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0015 Square kilometres per person against 0.0014 Square kilometres per person in China, a difference of 0.0001 Square kilometres per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

Aruba ranks 108th and China ranks 110th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and China in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0028 Square kilometres per person 0.0082 Square kilometres per person 0.0054 Square kilometres per person China
1970s 0.0027 Square kilometres per person 0.006 Square kilometres per person 0.0033 Square kilometres per person China
1980s 0.0026 Square kilometres per person 0.0046 Square kilometres per person 0.0019 Square kilometres per person China
1990s 0.002 Square kilometres per person 0.0022 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person China
2000s 0.0016 Square kilometres per person 0.0018 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person China
2010s 0.0015 Square kilometres per person 0.0015 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person China
2020s 0.0014 Square kilometres per person 0.0014 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per capita, Aruba or China?
Aruba, at 0.0015 Square kilometres per person against 0.0014 Square kilometres per person in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per capita between Aruba and China?
0.0001 Square kilometres per person, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and China rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per capita?
Aruba ranks 108th and China ranks 110th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs China: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/aruba/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/aruba/china/">Aruba vs China: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.