Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita

Bangladesh
0.0001 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0001 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
172nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
171st

Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0001 Square kilometres per person against 0.0001 Square kilometres per person in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 172nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 Square kilometres per person 0.0084 Square kilometres per person 0.0078 Square kilometres per person Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0.0069 Square kilometres per person 0.0065 Square kilometres per person Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0059 Square kilometres per person 0.0056 Square kilometres per person Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0006 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per capita, Bangladesh or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0001 Square kilometres per person against 0.0001 Square kilometres per person in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per capita between Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 Square kilometres per person, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per capita?
Bangladesh ranks 172nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/bangladesh/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.